cazmockett.com

I’m a regular reader of Roger Kondrat’s blog, Technological Winter. Today, he posted about a recent conference called BlogHer ‘06, organised by the BlogHer community – their website’s byeline is apprently “Where the women bloggers are”.

I was very interested in Roger’s comment “Blogher was interesting for me.. ..I mean as someone that doesn’t think male or female, I just read what I read”. And I think you’ve hit the nail on the head there, Roger. Why should the blogger’s gender matter? I believe exactly the same. I read what I read and that’s that. Sometimes you can’t event tell the gender of the blogger, (it’s one of the upsides of web anonymity, if you wish to be so). And I was wondering what makes a woman sign up for a blog precisely because it’s hosted by/for women?

I’ve always worked in very male-dominated industries. My first job was a broadcast engineer for the BBC, where around 10% of the workforce was female. I never felt I was treated differently as a women, and certainly didn’t find any prejudices in evidence. If you were good at your job, no one cared if you were a woman, you still got the respect you deserved. And I would never have wanted to be cut any breaks on the basis of my sex – don’t get me started on “positive discrimination”.

Now I’m still in a male-dominated profession – web design and development. At least, the design part is populated by quite a few more women, even if they aren’t so much in evidence on the development side of things (at least, that’s my experience). I reckon it’s about 20% women where I currently work. But again, if you’re any good, you could be a small, furry creature from Alpha Centauri and nobody would bat an eyelid.

Robert Scoble attended the conference, and his write-up suggests that perhaps women are using BlogHer because the tools are easier to pick up. But I have to ask, how hard is it to use Blogger, WordPress etc?

I have a very dear friend, who is a self-confessed technophobe. We’ve known each other since we were 11. At school, I was always the techie one, she the arty one. She majored in English & French Literature and went on to complete her PhD in that area, and now teaaches at one of the UK’s top universities. She hates computers with a passion – only using them when she has to (for writing, that is probably rather more than she would like). Which is why, when I visited her a few months ago, I was absolutely astounded to learn she has a blog of her own, LitLove. And a very fine one it is too. In a few short weeks she has engaged in tremendous debates with other like-minded folk. And she has got to grips with the WordPress publishing system with great success. So obviously, it can’t be that difficult to get a blog going, if you’re passioiniate enough about your subject.

So what am I really trying to say here? Probably, that ultimately, it’s all about the content of your blog that really matters. Not where it’s hosted, or what gender you happen to be. Personally, I’d much rather infiltrate the “male domain” that is the mainstream blogsphere than find myself in what is little better than a female ghetto! I am glad I was educated in a co-ed environment, and never wanted to go to an all-girls school – they can get pretty catty at times

I’m thinking of providing XML feeds from my two photographic websites, cazphoto.co.uk and rugbypix.com. I have a clean sheet, and could either use the Atom standard or RSS. So which is best? Are there any significant differences? I’ve heard rumours that Atom is somehow “better” but RSS is more widespread. It’s the old VHS vs Betamax chestnut rearing its head again! And I don’t really want to be on the wrong end of the seesaw in the future.

I suppose I could take the line that, if it’s good enough for the BBC, it’s good enough for me, and go with RSS. Although plenty of sites such as Blogger provide their feeds as Atom.

Do any of you have a choice over which format you use? And if so, which one did you plump for and why? I’d be interested to hear your thoughts

No, not the slogan from the Marketing Division of Sirius Cybernetics Corp…

I was at a Microsoft SharePoint 2007 demo today. We were treated to lots of glossy PowerPoint slides and a stand-alone demo, but it all flashed by pretty quickly. The product seems to be very versatile with inifinite possibilities, but I think it will sink or swim depending on the amount of time given to proper configuration. Much business analysis would also need to be done to accurately guague what features are appropriate for your particular setup, and how best they may be implemented.

As an Enterprise Content Management system, it seems (at first look) quite comprehensive. It has native Web Content Management capabilities out of the box (my particular sphere of interest), as well as tons of other integration with the Office 2007 suite of apps.

Architecture
The system is held together by the Plaform Services which handles things such as workspace, security, topology and the site model. Around this links the six main functional sections:

• Collaboration – enables wikis, blogs, calendars, tasks and other Outlook integration
• Portal – the Enterprise Portal, tailored content for users and their MySites area
• Search – scalable search with tabbed contextual results – such as data (documents), people, business.
• Content Management – integrates the document and records management functions, retention policies, workflow etc
• Business Forms – allows rich XML web forms to gather data for workflows etc
• Business Intelligence – allowing server-based Excel analysis, reporting of KPIs, data visualisation etc

Technologies
The system runs ASP.NET 2.0 with SQL Server; MasterPages provide templates for content (in the portal itself or for web publishing); there are also database services (for interaction with other external databases), search services, and workflow services. Unlike the 2003 implementation, the 2007 release is fully customisable in terms of layout, branding etc.

Making It Look Nice
The overlayed CSS skins can be edited with the SharePointDesigner package. This is apparently an “upgrade” to FrontPage (which the Microsoft man admitted was “crap” – tell us something we don’t know!). The CSS works in conjuction with the ASP.NET Master Pages. Content and presentation layers are fully separated, such that the XML services (Web Parts play a Big Part) are consumed by the ASP.NET Master Pages, which are then styled with the required CSS.

Content Types
Each content type can be configured at setup to require (or not) additional meta data to be saved with the file, by defining a document template. Out of the box, there are also a number of built-in behaviours associated with each content/document type (these were not elaborated on further).

Easy Peasy
Designing a customised web page within the portal is as easy as dragging and dropping the Web Parts onto a page – provided you have the correct permissions to do so. The system will also integrate with other document management systems such as Documentum. Offline integration with Outlook enables a user to take documents (or even whole websites) offline to work on (they can be checked out or just copied), then when they are back in connectivity with the server, they will be updated as appropriate. Last Saved Wins! (if the file was not checked out) Although, there is a facility in Word 2007 which will highlight the changes made between versions of a document to aid comparisons.

Accessibility
I asked how accessible the system was – and the reply was “it depends how you implement it”. Microsoft nicely passing the buck to those looking after the system! Also, the more freedom you give to local editors of content (devloved content provision being the point of it all, really) potentially the more problems you may have with accessibility, if these editors do not know what’s required.

Is Anyone There?
Presence is the term given to a system of icons (whether it be against a Word document or person in a search result) which let you know if the author/person is currently online, or out at a meeting (it interrogates their Outlook calendar) etc. Right-clicking the icon will get you access for initiating an IM conversation, or VoIP call (if you have the software installed), or looking at their MySpace page (personalised page which gives details of their interests, specialisms etc). Microsoft intranet users find this very helpful in communicating amongst themselves, without having to leave the SharePoint application to launch IM, for instance.

What now?
That was a whistle-stop tour of some features, from their standard demo. I will write more if I get involved in implementing an instance of SharePoint in the future (it’s a distinct possibility).

Inspired by Christian Heilmann’s presentation on DOM Scripting last week (he made JavaScript sound fun, for heavens’ sake!), I thought I would try and get my head round the concept. I’m much more familiar with CSS and tend to cower in the corner at the thought of writing any Javascript. So I thought I would buy a book. Well, I actually went into Borders looking for a newbie’s guide to PHP but came out with Jeremy Keith’’s DOM Scripting: Web Design with JavaScript and the Document Object Model (Friends of ED). How did that happen?

Talking of Jeremy and his friends at Clear:left, I have bought my ticket for the 2006 d.Construct meeting in Brighton on 8th September. It promises to be a good event, and I thought I might make a weekend of it and see a bit of Brighton while I’m at it (or is that just so I can recover from the post-con hangover??).

I’ve taken photos at a couple of events with my new Motorola L6, which I thought would be great to put on the blog. Once was at the recent Geeks Dinner the second was at the WSG London meeting. But sadly, I’m being defeated by technology.

You see, I don’t have any sort of picture messaging contract with my phone, so I can’t email them to myself… BUT! the phone has a handy USB port, so I thought I’d get ‘em off that way. Cue pain and suffering. The phone didn’t come with any software (drivers or otherwise) and WindowsXP doesn’t have any native drivers for the phone, although it recognises the make and model.

I thought I’d go straight to the horses’ mouth and searched the Motorola website for downloadable drivers for the L6. Nothing. Nada. Nowt. Plenty of glossy brochureware (you’re preaching to the converted, I already have one!) but nothing useful. A google or two later turned up quite a few disgruntled users also looking for the driver and posting their frustration on forums far and wide.

So the search continues. If and when I find the driver, I’ll upload the photos (they weren’t that exciting, so don’t hold your breath in anticipation). Until then, you’ll have to do with the text and make up your own cartoons to go with it